Romans 6

 

The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus.

 

Holy Trinity 2 November 2003                                                                                                                                                                                     AJM

 

Introduction

 

When I was 3 years old my cousin asked me to be her bridesmaid. Well, she asked my parents, to be quite precise. They agreed, so on the due day I set off by train with my father from London to Leeds. They did their best to make me feel at home, but as you know I am very shy and retiring, always have been, and when it came to it I stood at the beginning of the aisle behind my cousin and announced that I would only walk down it if my father came too. My father declined this offer, so I refused to go. They were very nice about it, and they gave me my thank you present anyway. This was it: a small gold cross. When I was ordained, my college gave me another one, this time made of pewter. When I visited a Maasai church in Tanzania, they gave me a third, this time made of beads. I’ve never asked for a cross, but I keep getting given them. And lots of people wear them, don’t they.

 

But have you ever thought why? Well, because we are Christians. But why the cross? Lots of things remind us of Christ, after all. Some people like to wear doves. Others wear little medallions. So why the cross? Why is it Christ’s death that we want to remember? Would you, for example, wear a tiny electric chair round your neck? Would you suspend a gold-plated hangman’s noose on the wall? Would you have a picture of a firing squad as the church logo? Some people like to sign themselves with the sign of the cross. Would you make the sign of a guillotine, say, as you prayed, like this perhaps? The cross is a symbol of torture, a gruesome form of execution. Why on earth did my cousin think that as a three year old, sweet as I was, I wanted one of these round my neck?

 

Well, that’s what this passage is about. The meaning of life, said the philosopher Kafka, is that it stops. Or as Paul puts it to the Romans, the wages of sin is death. The solution to both problems, says Paul, is to be found in the death of Christ on the cross. Well, at first sight that doesn’t make a lot of sense, does it. It sounds as if Jesus subscribed to the idea that if you can’t beat them, you’d better join them. But perhaps there’s more to it than that – or all these people wouldn’t keep giving me crosses.

 

The problem of sin

 

Last week we looked at chapter 5, and Paul’s explanation that the whole human race is affected by sin. So let’s take a step back and remind ourselves what exactly this sin is. It’s not a word our world uses much, is it, not in the sense Paul intends it to be used in, anyway. Sin has a kind of naughty-but-nice image. Like those rather tasty Magnum icecreams, named after the 7 deadly sins. When I was first trying to get my mind round all this life and death stuff, someone explained to me that to become a Christian I needed to repent of my sins. What were my sins? The things I needed to repent of. What was repentance? Dealing with my sins. I got rather lost in a tangle of religious jargon. Like when Edward talks to me about bike components. I listen hard, but I’m never very sure that I’m any the wiser at the end of it.

 

What then is sin? Well, we heard in chapter 5 that sin is something we all share, and the whole human race has always shared since the time of Adam. This is how the New York Times summarised the situation in an edition of 1946:

 

 

God’s plan made a hopeful beginning

But man spoiled his chances by sinning

We trust that the story

Will end in God’s glory

But at present the other side’s winning.

 

And the other side always will win. Sin, said Paul in chapter 5, is a condition. It’s like AIDS, sexually transmitted from parent to unborn child. And if it’s an inherited condition, it can’t be to do with magnum ice creams after all. In fact, it can’t be to do with specific things I do at all, can it, however bad they are. I may do sinful things, but those things are just the symptoms of my disease, they aren’t the disease itself.

 

What then is the disease? Well, maybe the word sin in English doesn’t explain that to us. It certainly didn’t explain it to me. Let’s look at the Greek word Paul uses. There are 5 words for sin in the New Testament, but Paul uses just one of them in this chapter. The word he uses is hamartia. It means, as Rodney pointed out when we looked at chapter 3, the missing of a target. There are other ways of thinking about it, but that’s the one Paul picks here. However hard we try to fire our arrow, we will always miss the target.

 

 

What’s the target? The target that we miss is God. Chapter 3.23: all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Sin is all the ways we aren’t like God, although we want to be. It’s all our imperfections, our cockups, our failures; our fears, the things we dislike about ourselves, the ways we hurt others. It’s everything which keeps us from God. The theologian Tillich explained sin by saying we can best understand it by thinking about separation. We’ve all experienced separation. Separation from other people, separation from the person we’d like to be, separation from God who is out there somewhere and seems to be always out of reach. The consequences of separation are dire. Separate a child from its mother and it doesn’t behave very well. Separate us from God and we don’t either. That’s sin.

 

So let’s sum it up. Here’s a definition of sin:

 

Text Box: Sin is an organic network of compulsive attitudes, beliefs and behaviour deeply rooted in an alienation from God.

 

 

 

It’s not an action, or a series of actions. It’s much more serious than that. It’s a condition, and the condition is one of alienation from God. And as God is the source of life, that means we are alienated from life. It means we are subject to death and decay. The wages of sin is death. When your arrow misses the target, it falls to the ground. And so, one day, will you.

 

Human solutions to the problem of sin

 

Well, that’s all a bit depressing, isn’t it. Our arrows are falling short, and soon we will be out of the competition altogether. What can we do about it? Paul is going to talk about that a lot in the next couple of chapters. But he makes a start here. There are two commonly tried solutions.

 

1. The LAW approach

 

The first solution we can call the Law approach. God’s temporary solution to the problem of sin was to give Moses a law which the people were to try and live by. This didn’t tackle the condition, the alienation from God that everyone was suffering from, but it did limit the symptoms, the attitudes, beliefs and behaviour that result from that alienation. And so we got the 10 commandments – they’re written up here in the chancel. To make it easier to apply them, the rabbis had expanded these commandments into a legal system which covered all aspects of human behaviour – and they’d come up with 248 commands, 365 prohibitions and 1521 amendments. Paul says the problem with the law is that it actually makes the situation worse – chapter 5 verse 20. It makes it worse because it just serves to highlight the problem. Bit like the speed cameras they are putting up everywhere – I got a fine for doing 47mph on a deserted main road at 7 in the morning, so now I’ve broken the law. Without the camera, I wouldn’t even have known about it.

 

There’s a temporary solution:

 

                                     

 

But the problem remains. Verse 12, do not let sin reign in you, Paul says. I do not come to abolish the law, Jesus said. Do we live under the law? Well, we aren’t measuring ourselves against 248 commands, 365 prohibitions and 1521 amendments, are we. But let’s ask ourselves some questions. Does this phrase strike a chord?

 

Try harder!

 

Or this one?

 

            I'm not up to this..

 

Or this one?

 

                        I'm a failure

 

Or even worse, this one?

 

                                    we can't allow that

 

Or this?

 

                                                we mustn't be associated with them

 

Or this?

 

                                                            that's awful!

 

 

Because all those thoughts represent attempts either to force ourselves to live by the rules, or to force other people to live by the rules. It’s not the rules that are the problem, it’s us. We, and everyone else, will fail.

 

 

2. The GRACE approach

 

I could talk for a long time about the way we make ourselves miserable trying to keep the rules. When I first became a Christian I spent years doing this, striving to be everything I thought I should be, and wondering why I wasn’t full of the freedom and joy being a Christian was supposed to bring. The first Christians in Rome evidently had the same problem. They knew they weren’t supposed to behave in the degenerate ways that were common in the world around them, and yet they also knew that keeping the rules was, however hard they tried, a recipe for failure. They knew that Christ had died for them, that their sins were forgiven, and that once more they were united with God. And so some of them had decided that they would rejoice in the freedom they had in Christ, and end the cycle of failure which comes from trying to keep the law. This we can call the Grace approach. It basically goes like this:

 

Christ died for our sins. Dare we make his martyrdom meaningless by not committing them?

 

These people felt that as all their sins were forgiven, it really didn’t matter what they did. Paul articulates their position in verse 1 and again in verse 15. Shall we go on sinning, so that grace may increase? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? And each time he makes the answer unequivocally clear: ‘By no means!’. Jesus did not die so that we can be let off our sins. He died so that we can be freed from them. They don’t do us any good anyway, as Paul points out in verse 21: what benefit did you reap from the things you are now ashamed of?

 

And so this whole issue is one of perplexity. On the one hand, we are no longer bound by the law, and we are set free from the restrictive practices of rule-bound living. But on the other, being a Christian clearly cannot be a licence for pleasing oneself; Christian freedom is freedom from sin and death, not freedom to do as you please, and Paul here is clearly indicating that some kinds of behaviour are appropriate for the Christian, others not. There must be another way. And that is what Paul wants to sketch out in the body of this chapter.

 

God’s solution to the problem of sin

 

What then is the solution to the problem of our disease of sin? It’s the cross. This is how Paul will sum it up at the end: the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus. To help us understand how it works, he’s going to use the picture of baptism. This is what he says, verses 3-4: don’t you know that all of us who were baptised into Christ Jesus were baptised into his death? We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.

 

So Paul seems to be saying that the solution to the problem of sin and death lies firstly in the death of Jesus, and secondly in the fact that when we are baptised, we die with him. That means that just as Jesus was raised from the dead, so are we, symbolically, when we undergo immersion in the waters of baptism. We should die, but instead we live.

 

Now it’s possible to misunderstand this. Two misunderstandings in particular are possible.

 

1. Baptism frees us from subjection to sin

 

The first was that made by the early Christians, perhaps by some of these self-same Romans, because after all it’s not really very easy to understand how it’s supposed to work in practice. Many people assumed that once you were baptised, that meant you were free from sin in the simplest way possible – that is, that you were no longer affected by it at all. Not just the symptoms of the disease, but the cause itself, was dealt with. You were completely cured. It was no longer a problem.

 

Many of the early Christians embraced this idea and set off to live happy sin-free lives, believing that baptism would mark a transition point between the old life and the new. But unfortunately they found it was not so. This caused very great difficulties in the first and second centuries. Those who had been baptised found that they were still sinning. People began to put baptism off until the last possible minute, often calling for the priest on their deathbed so that they didn’t invalidate it by sinning afterwards. Others reverted to the ‘try harder’ option; hermits retreated to the desert to do battle with their sinful desires alone, and monasteries imposed Rules to minimise the recurrence of sin in the lives of monks. Monks were thought to stand a better chance of getting into heaven than ordinary people as a result. Whole works were written on how to deal with sin after baptism, and over the centuries an enormous great edifice of confession and penance was built up. Manuals were written for the guidance of priests, detailing scores of possible sins and advising on appropriate penitential measures. And gradually the emphasis shifted, and eventuallly the message that I received was born: that the Christian life is one of repeated failure for which repeated apology is necessary – the law approach all over again.

 

2. Baptism frees us from the consequences of sin

 

And then there was a second error. To many it was painfully obvious that even after baptism they still found themselves suffering from sin. Their struggles and desires remained unchanged. And so a second doctrine grew up. Baptism doesn’t free you from sin, but it does free you from the consequence of sin. Baptism was a kind of passport to heaven. But just as the idea that baptism frees us from subjection to sin really ends up taking us back to trying harder, so the idea that it is a kind of passport which once you’ve got it will see you through takes us back to the idea that you might as well keep sinning and rely on grace. It reduces the death of Jesus on the cross to a kind of formula. Common sense shows this can’t be right:

 

 

So what exactly did Paul mean? Well, he will explain it fully and much more practically when we get to chapter 8. Here it’s all very abstract. Essentially there are two things to grasp. The first he explains in verses 1-14.

 

Dealing with death

 

Jesus died and rose again. Baptism is a picture of that for us. Here you have to remember that baptism was done by full immersion in a river. You’d have walked into the water perhaps up to waist height, and then they’d have dunked you under the surface. It was a symbolic acting out of your death and resurrection. The symbolism of baptism is not cleansing, as we often assume, but dying. You aren’t washed in the waters as they close over your head, you’re drowned in them. Then you rise again. You die, and then you receive new life. And you do that because you are joining yourself to Christ who has already done it on your behalf. You are filling in the application form, and getting it stamped. One day it will happen to you in actual fact: your body will die, but your spirit will live on. From the moment of your baptism into Christ, your body has died only symbolically. That much is obvious, because you are still walking around in it. But your spirit has received new life not just symbolically but in a real transaction. You are now alive in a new way: spiritually alive. Like Christ himself, you will never die again – verse 9. That’s why you wear that little cross round your neck. It represents the fact that Christ’s death is also yours.

 

Dealing with sin

 

So far, so good. That deals with death. But what about sin? This is where the real confusion lies, and this is the subject of the second half of the chapter, verses 15-23. The key word is another rather technical word, and it’s in verse 19. It’s sanctification. Sanctification means ‘making holy’. ‘Holy’ means ‘separate’. In other words, sanctification is about removing the alienation between you and God by transporting you to where he is. It’s a gradual process, and it involves you becoming like him. The separation ends in theory when you turn to Christ. But it ends in practice more gradually, as you grow to become like Christ. So in legal terms you are freed from sin, or justified as the word in verse 7 is in the Greek, as soon as you turn to Christ. But in practical terms you are freed from sin gradually and daily, as you determine to submit your mind, desires and feelings to God.

 

Paul explains this not just here but in other letters too, and he puts it in different ways on different occasions. To the Corinthians he talked about being made new, a new creation. To the Colossians he talked about taking off the old nature and putting on the new, like taking off an old jacket and putting on a new one. This too comes from the early practice of baptism, because when you were baptised you would go under the water wearing old clothes, and put new ones on when you came out.

 

So Paul is saying that the Christian is not a person who abandons those rules and lives according to these rules, or who moves from living according to no rules at all to living according to a new set of Christian ones, or who changes from a rule-bound existence to a rule-free existence. It isn’t about rules at all. The Christian is a person who changes orientation, a person who is learning to listen not to their old compulsions but to the Spirit of God himself, for the power which kept them apart is now gone. If you want it in human terms, says Paul, look at it like this: you used to be slaves of sin, now you are slaves of righteousness. It’s like a tug of war, verse 19. you used to get pulled one way, towards sin and death; but now you can allow yourself to be pulled the other way, towards freedom and life. You have changed your orientation. Which, after all, is what the word repent actually means: it means ‘think again’.

 

deathlife

 

So. You are a Christian. You have been baptised into Christ. You have died and been raised again. You have put on a new set of clothes. You are a new creation. What does that mean? Well, for the moment you are still here, in the body which symbolically died but in which actually you still live. It’s still subject to the same temptations and struggles as ever it was. But, in that body you have a renewed spirit. You are in touch with God. You have a new power within you, the power of life itself. So whereas before you gave in to the forces of sin, now you have the power to resist them. You’re still in a tug of war, but whereas you used to lose it, now you can win it. How, you want to know? Well, you’ll have to wait till the week after next to find that out. Unless of course, you want to read chapter 8 for yourselves. Meanwhile, keep wearing the cross.

 

                                                                                                           

                                                            The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus.