A challenge to the idol of relevance
Baker Books 2003 AJM
Nov 04
An excellent short book on how to resist the tides
of cultural conformity.
It’s sad to say that rarely
has the church seen so many of its leaders solemnly presenting the faith in
public in so many weak, trite, foolish, disastrous, and even disloyal ways as today…
How on earth have we Christians become so irrelevant when we have tried so hard
to be relevant?.. Never have Christians pursued relevance more strenuously;
never have Christians been more irrelevant. 11-12
The
gospel itself is relevant – ‘because it addresses the human condition
appropriately, pertinently, and effectively as nothing else has, does, or can –
in generation after generation, culture after culture, and life after life’. 13
It is the world’s first truly universal religion, and the Christian faith is
the most diverse society on earth.
By our uncritical pursuit
of relevance we have actually courted irrelevance; by our breathless chase
after relevance without a matching commitment to faithfulness, we have become
not only unfaithful but irrelevant; by our determined efforts to redefine
ourselves in ways that are more compelling to the modern world than are
faithful to Christ, we have lost not only our identity but our authority and
our relevance. Our crying need is to be faithful as well as relevant. 15.
Coleridge:
‘the great majority of men live like bats, but in twilight, and know and feel
the philosophy of their ages only by its reflections and refractions’. 17 We
have information, but not understanding – ‘homo-up-to-datum’ (Boorstin) is a
dunce.
We
must become untimely people, a term taken from Nietzsche, who saw that
independent thinkers are always out of step with the conventional wisdom of
their generation. The thinkers of today are caught in fashion and conformity.
Independent thinkers are the thinkers of tomorrow, at home not in this age but
elsewhere.
Prophecy
– in many Christian circles prophecy is shorthand for uncheckable charismatic
hunches, or for any left-wing radical critique of the status quo – need to
distinguish Prophets from prophets. Capital P Prophets, eg Isaiah, Jeremiah,
hear direct words from God. Little p prophets are those who interpret their
life and times from a biblical perspective but do not presume the authority and
infallibility of the Prophets. 21.
1. Faces of the sinister god
The clock. Invented c.1400. It now characterises
the difference between modern and traditional cultures; modernism would not
have been possible without it. Filipinos: ‘Westerners are people with gods on
their wrists’. The modern view of time is as clock time. Features:
·
Precision – we can now measure anywhere and
everywhere in the universe; instead of the daily rhythm of time we have one
which depends on calculation and is measured not in days but in seconds. And
this is how we live.
·
Coordination
– precise time makes it possible for society to be far more complex, with
appointments and communications and computers to make everything interconnect.
·
Pressure
– this is the one we are aware of; clock time drives us. Fielding in 1751 was
the first to say that time is money; now we seek quality time, use every second
even in our leisure time, eat fast food.
2. The tyrannies of time
Words are handles or labels that we stick on
reality; the way we say things shapes the way we see things. So it is with
time; it began to influence thought. So people began to see the universe as
clockwork in C17th. The ‘uncivilised’ are now thought to be behind (earlier it was outside). ‘Progress’ is to do with time.
Any change is progress. Gibbon: ‘it may be safely presumed that no people,
unless the force of nature is changed, will relapse into their original
barbarisms… We may therefore acquiesce in the pleasing conclusion that every
age of the world has increased, and still increases, the real wealth, the
happiness, the knowledge, and perhaps the virtue, of the human race.’ 42. And
then the Reign of Terror which killed him; and the Holocaust…
3. Impossible stances
The church must be both for the world and against
the world – a dual stance which must be carefully maintained. When we do, we
have the power to both transform and renew culture. When we don’t, we become
corrupt and decline. Of all the cultures the church has lived in, the modern world
is the most powerful, pervasive, and pressurizing. The exploding churches in
There are 3 stances we have traditionally taken
towards the modern world; none is easy in the modern context:
assumption – sth in modern thought is
assumed superior to Christian thought
abandonment – everything wh does not fit
with it is cast aside
adaptation – sth new is assumed, sth old is
abandoned, everything else is adapted
assimilation – outcome is that everything is
absorbed by the modern assumptions
Understand
the dominant thought of the day and you understand the infatuations of
liberalism, for theology follows philosophy as a tail follows a dog.. 62.
WCC 1966: ‘the world must set the agenda for the Church’.
‘A great part of the evangelical community has
transferred authority from Sola Scriptura to Sola Cultura.’ 65
4. Siren calls to captivity
Alexander the Great: ‘the Persians would always be
slaves, because they did not know how to pronounce the word No.’ 69 In US in
particular, mimicking modernity in Christian language is the best that many
Christian thinkers have been able to muster for some time.
Three forms of cultural captivity:
5. The price of faithfulness
For any Christians who would speak out today in a
time of the church’s deepening cultural captivity, prophetic untimeliness
carries a clear cost:
Misfits in an ill-fitting world : a sense of
maladjustment. The man/woman who lives by faith does not fit in. Praised
prophets are mostly dead prophets.
A sense of impatience : frustration at the
blocking of the purposes of God
A sense of failure – having a calling which
does not see fulfilment
6. Escaping cultural captivity
How do we do it?
1. Developing an awareness of the unfashionable –
by wrestling with difficlt truths, seeking to present the Christian message as
sth distinct from one’s own ideas. By pursuing a radical obedience – not to
credal confession, but to the call of Jesus. Eg Bonhoeffer.
2. Appreciating the historical, which is the best
way to have a counterperspective on our own day. Knowing how to use history to
judge the present; history provides a deeper knowledge of our humanity than
does science. Read old books as well as new ones.
3. Attention to the eternal. Simone Weil: to be always relevant, you have to say
things which are eternal. The church will always spring back, because it
has the seeds of renewal built into it, in a way for example that communism
didn’t. The seeds are sin – the church’s doctrine of its own failure – and
scripture – the church has a judgement that transcends history.
Conclusion
We cannot arrest time through nostalgia. Or through
the idea of an endless cycle in which things will spin back right again. Or
through our world’s favourite method: better time management and improved
efficiency – which leads only to an even faster pace of life and greater
pressures.
Redeeming time:
The secret is to be untimely : to go
forward, we must always go back. 99% of what we know about the future is the
past.
Resistance thinkers alone are fresh and
creative; progressives prove stagnant.
We can redeem time only through the one who
is the redeemer of everything. Time isn’t money; money is time. We spend our
time in making money, in spending money, in hoarding money – time is our
currency, and all the money in the world can’t give us an extra second.